1
Easy2Siksha
GNDU Question Paper-2021
Ba/BSc 3
rd
Semester
HISTORY
[History of India (A.D. 1707-1947)]
Time Allowed: 3 Hrs. Maximum Marks: 100
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section.
SECTION-A
1. The Battle of Plassey is one of the most important battles in the history of the world.
Discuss.
2. Discuss the political and economic factors that paved the way for the Revolt of 1857.
SECTION-B
3. Critically examine the Agrarian Policies of the British in India.
4. Give an account of the contribution of the Brahmo Samaj in the religious and social
field.
SECTION-C
5. Critically examine the impact of Revolutionary Movement on the National Mov 6. Why
did Mahatma Gandhi launch Non-Cooperation Movement ?
2
Easy2Siksha
Discuss its significance in the history Freedom Movement in India.
SECTION-D
7. Discuss the system of Dyarchy set up in the provinces by the Government of India Act,
1919. Why did it fail?
8. Critically examine the proposals and outcome of the Cabinet Mission Plan.
3
Easy2Siksha
GNDU Answer Paper-2021
Ba/BSc 3
rd
Semester
HISTORY
[History of India (A.D. 1707-1947)]
Time Allowed: 3 Hrs. Maximum Marks: 100
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section.
SECTION-A
1. The Battle of Plassey is one of the most important battles in the history of the world.
Ans. The Battle of Plassey: A Turning Point in History
The Battle of Plassey is a landmark event in world history, often considered one of the most
important battles in the context of colonialism and the rise of empires. This battle, fought
on June 23, 1757, in India, was a crucial conflict between the British East India Company and
the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-Daula. The outcome of this battle had far-reaching effects on
the course of Indian and British history.
Background
To understand the significance of the Battle of Plassey, it is essential to know the historical
context. During the 18th century, India was a land of diverse kingdoms and regional powers.
The Mughal Empire, which had once been a dominant force in India, was weakening, and
local rulers and factions were vying for power.
Among these rulers was Siraj-ud-Daula, who became the Nawab of Bengal in 1756. Bengal,
located in the eastern part of India, was a rich and prosperous region, known for its wealth
and strategic importance. Siraj-ud-Daula was determined to assert his control over Bengal
and challenge the influence of the British East India Company, a powerful trading
corporation from Britain.
4
Easy2Siksha
The British East India Company
• The British East India Company was a major player in India’s political and economic
landscape. Originally established for trade, the company gradually expanded its
influence and power in India. By the mid-18th century, the company had significant
control over various parts of India, thanks to its military strength and strategic
alliances.
• In Bengal, the East India Company had established its trading post in Calcutta (now
Kolkata). The company’s presence in Bengal and its growing influence alarmed Siraj-
ud-Daula. He was particularly concerned about the company’s increasing
fortifications and its interference in the local politics of Bengal.
The Build-Up to the Battle
• Tensions between Siraj-ud-Daula and the British East India Company escalated over
time. The Nawab was determined to drive the company out of Bengal, and he took
several actions against them. He besieged the British-controlled fort in Calcutta,
known as Fort William, which resulted in the infamous Black Hole of Calcutta
incident. This event, where British prisoners were allegedly confined in a small,
suffocating cell, inflamed British sentiment and led to a call for revenge.
• In response to Siraj-ud-Daula’s actions, the British East India Company sought the
support of local allies who were dissatisfied with the Nawab’s rule. One of the key
figures who played a crucial role was Mir Jafar, a general in Siraj-ud-Daula’s army
who was unhappy with the Nawab’s leadership.
The Battle
• The Battle of Plassey was fought near the village of Plassey, located in present-day
West Bengal, India. The British forces, led by Robert Clive, were significantly
outnumbered compared to Siraj-ud-Daula’s army. However, the British had a
strategic advantage due to their alliances with local factions, including Mir Jafar.
• On the day of the battle, June 23, 1757, the British East India Company’s troops
faced the Nawab’s forces. Despite the numerical disadvantage, the British were able
to secure a decisive victory. The key factor that led to the British victory was the
betrayal of Mir Jafar and other discontented factions within Siraj-ud-Daula’s camp.
This internal discord weakened the Nawab’s position and allowed the British forces
to triumph.
Aftermath and Significance
The Battle of Plassey was a turning point in Indian history. The victory of the British East
India Company had profound consequences for both India and Britain.
1. Establishment of British Rule: The defeat of Siraj-ud-Daula marked the beginning of
British dominance in India. After the battle, Mir Jafar was installed as the Nawab of
Bengal, but he was a puppet ruler under British control. This laid the foundation for
5
Easy2Siksha
the British East India Company to consolidate its power and eventually establish
direct British rule over large parts of India.
2. Economic Control: With the victory at Plassey, the British East India Company gained
control over Bengal, one of the richest provinces in India. This control allowed the
company to exploit Bengal’s resources and wealth, significantly boosting its
economic power.
3. Impact on Indian Politics: The Battle of Plassey weakened the local rulers and
political structures in India. The British East India Company’s control over Bengal set
a precedent for their expansion into other regions of India, leading to the eventual
establishment of British India.
4. Global Implications: The battle had global implications as well. The British Empire’s
expansion in India became a significant part of its global dominance, affecting trade,
politics, and colonialism worldwide. The resources and wealth acquired from India
played a crucial role in the growth of the British Empire.
Conclusion
The Battle of Plassey is a crucial event in history due to its impact on the course of Indian
and British history. It marked the beginning of British dominance in India and set the stage
for the establishment of British rule over the subcontinent. The victory of the British East
India Company at Plassey had far-reaching consequences, shaping the political, economic,
and social landscape of India for years to come. Understanding the significance of this battle
helps us appreciate the complex history of colonialism and its effects on different parts of
the world.
2. Discuss the political and economic factors that paved the way for the Revolt of 1857.
Ans. The Revolt of 1857: Political and Economic Factors
The Revolt of 1857, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny or the First War of Indian
Independence, was a major turning point in Indian history. It was a widespread uprising
against the British East India Company and its rule in India. Several political and economic
factors contributed to this revolt. Let’s break these down to understand how they led to the
uprising.
1. Political Factors
1.1. Discontent Among Indian Soldiers (Sepoys)
The Indian soldiers, known as sepoys, were discontented due to several reasons:
6
Easy2Siksha
• Low Pay and Poor Conditions: Sepoys were poorly paid and had to endure harsh
conditions. Their salaries were low, and they faced difficult working conditions in the
army.
• Social and Religious Insensitivity: The British East India Company’s policies were
seen as disrespectful to Indian religions. For example, the introduction of the new
Enfield rifle cartridges that were rumored to be greased with animal fat (pork and
beef), which was offensive to both Hindus and Muslims.
1.2. Political Unrest
• Annexation Policies: The British annexed Indian states through policies like the
Doctrine of Lapse. According to this policy, if a ruler died without a male heir, their
state would be annexed by the British. This led to the annexation of many princely
states, causing anger among Indian rulers and their subjects.
• Loss of Autonomy: Indian rulers and local leaders lost their authority and autonomy
due to British interference in their governance and administrative matters.
1.3. Influence of the British Policies
• Land Revenue Policies: The British imposed heavy land taxes on Indian farmers. The
revenue policies often led to the exploitation of farmers, causing widespread
economic distress.
• Legal and Administrative Changes: The British introduced new laws and
administrative changes that were unfamiliar and often unfair to Indians. These
changes included modifications to traditional legal systems, which led to frustration
among Indians.
2. Economic Factors
2.1. Economic Exploitation
• Drain of Wealth: The British policies led to a significant drain of India’s wealth.
Profits from Indian resources were sent to Britain, while India saw little benefit. This
exploitation contributed to widespread poverty and economic hardship in India.
• Destruction of Local Industries: British policies favored British industries over local
Indian industries. Indian artisans and weavers suffered as their products were unable
to compete with British goods, leading to the collapse of local industries.
2.2. Land Revenue System
• High Taxes: The British introduced a high land revenue system, which placed a heavy
burden on farmers. Many farmers were unable to pay these taxes, leading to debt
and poverty.
• Economic Hardship: The constant increase in land taxes and other economic policies
caused significant economic hardship. The peasantry faced severe distress due to
these high taxes and poor economic conditions.
7
Easy2Siksha
2.3. Economic Discontent
• Famine and Starvation: The economic policies of the British often led to famines and
food shortages. Poor harvests, combined with high taxes and British export policies,
led to widespread famine and starvation in India.
• Unemployment: The decline of local industries and traditional crafts led to high
unemployment rates among Indian artisans and workers.
Conclusion
The Revolt of 1857 was the result of a combination of political and economic factors. The
British policies, including land revenue systems, economic exploitation, and political
interference, created widespread dissatisfaction among Indians. The discontent among
soldiers and the general public led to a significant uprising against British rule.
The revolt was a turning point in Indian history, marking the beginning of a more organized
struggle for independence. It highlighted the need for political and economic reforms and
set the stage for future movements that aimed to achieve freedom and justice for the Indian
people.
Understanding these factors helps in recognizing the complexities of the Revolt of 1857 and
the various grievances that led to it. It was not just a military mutiny but a significant socio-
political and economic upheaval that aimed to challenge and change the oppressive British
rule in India.
SECTION-B
3. Critically examine the Agrarian Policies of the British in India.
Ans. Agrarian Policies of the British in India: A Simplified Examination
The agrarian policies of the British in India had a profound impact on the country's
economy, society, and agriculture. To understand these effects, we need to look at the
policies introduced by the British and their consequences.
1. Introduction to British Agrarian Policies
When the British East India Company established control over India, they needed to manage
the vast agricultural resources to support their empire. The agrarian policies they
implemented were designed to maximize revenue from land and establish a stable
administration. These policies, however, often disregarded the traditional agricultural
practices and local needs, leading to widespread economic and social issues.
8
Easy2Siksha
2. Land Revenue Systems
One of the central aspects of British agrarian policy was the land revenue system. The British
introduced several systems to collect revenue from the land, which were:
a. The Permanent Settlement (1793):
• Overview: Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, this system was implemented in Bengal,
Bihar, and Orissa. It fixed the land revenue permanently, which meant that
landowners (zamindars) had to pay a set amount of revenue to the British
government.
• Impact: This system aimed to create a stable revenue stream but led to several
problems:
o Increased Burden on Zamindars: Zamindars were responsible for paying the
fixed revenue, often leading them to exploit peasants to meet the demands.
o Neglect of Land Improvement: Since the revenue was fixed, zamindars had
little incentive to invest in land improvements or agricultural productivity.
o Increased Peasant Exploitation: With the zamindars’ focus on maximizing
revenue, peasants faced high rents and oppressive conditions.
b. The Ryotwari System (1820s):
• Overview: This system was introduced in Madras and Bombay Presidencies by
Thomas Munro and was based on the direct assessment of land revenue from
individual farmers (ryots).
• Impact:
o Direct Taxation: Farmers paid taxes directly to the government, which
theoretically provided a fairer system but often resulted in heavy taxation.
o Uncertainty and Instability: The amount of revenue was reassessed
periodically, creating uncertainty for farmers. Poor harvests could lead to
devastating consequences for their livelihood.
c. The Mahalwari System (1822):
• Overview: Introduced by William Bentinck, this system was used in the northern and
central parts of India. It involved collecting revenue from groups of villages (mahals)
rather than individuals.
• Impact:
o Collective Responsibility: Revenue was collected from the entire mahal,
which sometimes led to disputes and difficulties in managing payments.
o Administrative Challenges: The system was complex and often difficult to
administer, resulting in inefficiencies and corruption.
3. Economic and Social Impacts
The British agrarian policies had several economic and social impacts:
9
Easy2Siksha
a. Economic Impact:
• Land Degradation: Policies like the Permanent Settlement led to neglect of land
improvement, resulting in soil degradation and reduced agricultural productivity.
• Debt and Poverty: High taxes and exploitative practices led many farmers into debt
and poverty. The burden of paying revenue often led to the selling of land and loss of
livelihood.
• Monoculture and Cash Crops: The British encouraged the cultivation of cash crops
(such as indigo and opium) for export, which reduced the land available for food
crops and affected food security.
b. Social Impact:
• Social Unrest: The exploitation by zamindars and high taxes caused widespread
social unrest and dissatisfaction among farmers. This contributed to several uprisings
and protests.
• Changes in Land Ownership: The zamindar system altered traditional land
ownership structures, leading to changes in local power dynamics and social
hierarchies.
4. Resistance and Reforms
The negative impacts of British agrarian policies led to resistance and demands for reforms:
a. Peasant Movements:
• Revolts and Uprisings: Various peasant movements and uprisings, such as the Indigo
Rebellion and the Champaran Satyagraha, were direct responses to exploitative
practices and harsh policies.
• Demand for Reforms: These movements highlighted the need for reforms in land
revenue policies and better treatment of farmers.
b. Reforms:
• Post-Independence Reforms: After India gained independence in 1947, the new
government introduced reforms to address the issues caused by British policies,
including land reforms aimed at redistributing land and improving agricultural
practices.
5. Conclusion
The British agrarian policies in India were designed to maximize revenue and streamline
administration but had far-reaching negative consequences for the agricultural sector and
rural society. The Permanent Settlement, Ryotwari System, and Mahalwari System each had
their own set of challenges and impacts, leading to economic hardship, social unrest, and
land degradation. The resistance movements and subsequent reforms post-independence
10
Easy2Siksha
aimed to address some of these issues, but the legacy of British policies continued to
influence Indian agriculture and land management practices for years to come.
4. Give an account of the contribution of the Brahmo Samaj in the religious and social
field.
Ans. The Brahmo Samaj was a significant socio-religious reform movement in India during
the 19th century. It played a crucial role in transforming the religious and social landscape of
the country, particularly in Bengal. To understand its contribution, let's break it down into
key areas: the founding of the Brahmo Samaj, its religious reforms, its social reforms, and its
lasting impact on Indian society.
1. Founding of the Brahmo Samaj
• The Brahmo Samaj was founded in 1828 by Raja Ram Mohan Roy, a prominent social
reformer and intellectual of the time. He was deeply influenced by the teachings of
the Upanishads and was opposed to the orthodox practices of Hinduism, such as idol
worship, caste discrimination, and rituals that he found superstitious.
• Raja Ram Mohan Roy believed in the idea of one God and advocated for the worship
of a formless, single deity. He was also greatly influenced by Western education and
rationalism, which shaped his vision for reforming Hindu society. The Brahmo Samaj
was initially called the "Brahmo Sabha" and was established as a forum for discussing
religious ideas, promoting monotheism, and combating social evils.
2. Religious Reforms
The Brahmo Samaj introduced several important religious reforms aimed at purifying
Hinduism and making it more rational and ethical. Some of these reforms include:
• Monotheism: The Brahmo Samaj rejected the polytheistic practices prevalent in
Hinduism and advocated for the worship of one God. This was a significant departure
from traditional Hindu practices and aligned more with the principles of rationalism
and universalism.
• Opposition to Idol Worship: Raja Ram Mohan Roy and the Brahmo Samaj were
strongly against idol worship, which they saw as a form of superstition. They
promoted the idea of worshipping God in spirit and truth, without any physical
representations.
• Rational Approach to Religion: The Brahmo Samaj emphasized a rational and ethical
approach to religion. It encouraged its followers to question traditional practices and
beliefs and to adopt a more reasoned and moral way of living. This included a focus
on personal morality and the rejection of rituals that did not align with ethical
principles.
• Scriptural Reinterpretation: The Brahmo Samaj sought to reinterpret Hindu
scriptures, particularly the Upanishads, to align with its monotheistic and rationalist
11
Easy2Siksha
principles. Raja Ram Mohan Roy translated and published several religious texts,
including the Vedas and Upanishads, to make them accessible to the common
people and to promote a more enlightened understanding of Hinduism.
3. Social Reforms
Apart from religious reforms, the Brahmo Samaj played a crucial role in advocating for social
reforms in Indian society. These reforms were aimed at eradicating social evils and
promoting equality and justice. Some of the key social reforms promoted by the Brahmo
Samaj include:
• Abolition of Sati: One of the most significant contributions of the Brahmo Samaj was
its campaign against the practice of Sati, where widows were forced or expected to
immolate themselves on their husband's funeral pyre. Raja Ram Mohan Roy was
instrumental in getting the British government to outlaw Sati in 1829, marking a
major victory for social reform in India.
• Women's Rights: The Brahmo Samaj was a strong advocate for women's rights. It
opposed practices like child marriage and supported the education of women. The
Samaj also promoted widow remarriage and worked towards improving the status of
women in society.
• Caste System: The Brahmo Samaj strongly opposed the caste system and the
discrimination it perpetuated. It promoted the idea of the equality of all human
beings and rejected the notion of social hierarchy based on birth. The Samaj also
sought to break down barriers between different castes and communities,
advocating for social integration and harmony.
• Promotion of Education: The Brahmo Samaj emphasized the importance of
education as a means of social upliftment. It established several schools and
colleges, including institutions for women's education. The Samaj believed that
education was key to eradicating social evils and empowering individuals to lead
moral and productive lives.
4. Impact of the Brahmo Samaj
The impact of the Brahmo Samaj on Indian society was profound and far-reaching. It laid the
foundation for many other reform movements that followed and contributed significantly to
the social and religious awakening of India. Some of the key impacts of the Brahmo Samaj
include:
• Inspiration for Other Reform Movements: The Brahmo Samaj inspired other reform
movements in India, such as the Arya Samaj, the Prarthana Samaj, and the Aligarh
Movement. These movements, though different in their approaches, shared the
common goal of reforming Indian society and religion.
• Modernization of Hinduism: The Brahmo Samaj played a crucial role in modernizing
Hinduism and making it more compatible with the values of the modern world. It
helped to transform Hinduism into a more rational, ethical, and inclusive religion,
which could withstand the challenges of the colonial era.
12
Easy2Siksha
• Nationalism and Social Reform: The Brahmo Samaj also contributed to the growth
of Indian nationalism. The social reforms it advocated were closely linked to the idea
of national regeneration, and the Samaj's leaders were often involved in the broader
struggle for Indian independence. The emphasis on social equality, education, and
women's rights also helped to lay the groundwork for a more inclusive and
progressive vision of Indian society.
• Legacy of Leaders: The Brahmo Samaj produced several prominent leaders and
thinkers who continued to influence Indian society long after the movement itself
had declined. These leaders included Keshub Chandra Sen, who further developed
the ideas of the Brahmo Samaj and sought to create a universal religion, and
Rabindranath Tagore, who was associated with the Brahmo Samaj and carried
forward its ideals in his writings and social work.
5. Challenges and Criticisms
While the Brahmo Samaj made significant contributions to Indian society, it also faced
several challenges and criticisms. Some of these include:
• Limited Reach: The Brahmo Samaj primarily operated in Bengal and had limited
influence in other parts of India. Its ideas were often seen as too radical or
Westernized for the conservative masses, and it struggled to gain widespread
acceptance.
• Internal Divisions: The Brahmo Samaj experienced several internal divisions,
particularly over issues like the role of rituals and the extent of Western influence.
These divisions weakened the movement and led to the formation of splinter
groups, such as the Adi Brahmo Samaj and the Sadharan Brahmo Samaj.
• Criticism from Orthodox Hindus: The Brahmo Samaj faced strong opposition from
orthodox Hindus, who saw its reforms as a threat to traditional Hindu practices and
beliefs. This opposition sometimes led to social ostracism and hostility towards the
members of the Brahmo Samaj.
6. Conclusion
The Brahmo Samaj played a pivotal role in shaping the religious and social landscape of
19th-century India. Through its advocacy for monotheism, rejection of idol worship, and
emphasis on rationalism, it sought to purify and modernize Hinduism. At the same time, its
efforts to eradicate social evils like Sati, promote women's rights, and challenge the caste
system marked significant strides towards social reform
13
Easy2Siksha
SECTION-C
5. Critically examine the impact of Revolutionary Movement on the National Mov 6. Why
did Mahatma Gandhi launch Non-Cooperation Movement ?
Ans: The Revolutionary Movement in India refers to the various radical activities and
movements carried out by Indian freedom fighters to overthrow British rule. These
revolutionaries believed in direct action, often involving violence, as a means to achieve
independence. This movement played a crucial role in shaping the broader National
Movement for independence, led by figures like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and
Subhas Chandra Bose. To understand its impact, let's break down the key aspects in a simple
and memorable way.
1. The Origins of the Revolutionary Movement
• Early Discontent: After the fall of the Mughal Empire in 1707, British control over
India grew stronger, leading to widespread discontent. The Revolt of 1857, also
known as the First War of Independence, was a major uprising but ultimately failed.
This set the stage for more organized efforts against British rule.
• Inspiration from Abroad: Indian revolutionaries were inspired by international
movements, such as the French and American Revolutions. The idea of using force to
challenge oppression resonated with many young Indians who were frustrated by
the slow pace of constitutional reforms.
• Key Organizations: Groups like the Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar in Bengal, and the
Ghadar Party in North America, were among the earliest revolutionary organizations.
They believed in the use of arms and violence to achieve freedom.
2. Key Revolutionary Activities
• Bombings and Assassinations: Revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar
Azad, and Rajguru carried out several high-profile attacks against British officials. The
most famous of these was the assassination of Saunders, a British police officer, in
1928 by Bhagat Singh and Rajguru, as a revenge for the death of Lala Lajpat Rai.
• Ghadar Movement: The Ghadar Party, founded by Indian expatriates in the United
States and Canada, aimed to incite a mutiny in the British Indian Army. Although the
movement did not achieve its objectives, it demonstrated the global nature of the
struggle for Indian independence.
• Kakori Conspiracy: In 1925, a group of revolutionaries led by Ram Prasad Bismil and
Ashfaqulla Khan looted a train carrying government money near Kakori, Uttar
Pradesh. This act of defiance became a symbol of revolutionary zeal.
3. Impact on the National Movement
• Inspiring the Masses: The courage and sacrifice of revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh,
Sukhdev, and Rajguru inspired a generation of Indians to join the freedom struggle.
14
Easy2Siksha
Their actions highlighted the brutality of British rule and the need for immediate
action.
• Shifting Public Opinion: The revolutionary activities, especially the trial and
execution of Bhagat Singh, shifted public opinion. Even though Mahatma Gandhi did
not support their violent methods, he acknowledged their patriotism and the role
they played in awakening the masses.
• Pressure on the British: The revolutionary activities created significant pressure on
the British government. They were forced to increase security measures and tighten
laws, which in turn fueled more resentment among Indians.
4. Mahatma Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement
• Background: The Non-Cooperation Movement was launched by Mahatma Gandhi in
1920 as a response to the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre and the oppressive Rowlatt Act.
Unlike the revolutionaries, Gandhi advocated for non-violent resistance, or
Satyagraha.
• Objectives: The movement aimed to paralyze the British administration by
withdrawing cooperation in all forms, including boycotting British goods, schools,
courts, and services.
• Mass Participation: Gandhi’s call for non-cooperation resonated with millions of
Indians across the country. It marked a shift from elite politics to mass politics,
involving peasants, workers, students, and women.
• Significance: The Non-Cooperation Movement was the first mass-scale movement
that united people from all regions and communities in India against British rule. It
showed the British that Indians could organize and mobilize large-scale protests.
5. The Relationship Between Revolutionary and Non-Cooperation Movements
• Different Approaches, Same Goal: Both the revolutionary and non-cooperation
movements aimed for the same goal—Indian independence. However, their
methods were different. Revolutionaries believed in armed struggle, while Gandhi
believed in non-violence.
• Mutual Influence: While Gandhi’s methods were non-violent, the revolutionary
activities often complemented the broader national movement by keeping the spirit
of resistance alive. The British were aware that they faced threats from both non-
cooperation and revolutionary violence.
• Public Support: The sacrifices of revolutionaries created a wave of sympathy and
support for the freedom struggle. Even though Gandhi did not support their violent
methods, the respect they commanded among the masses indirectly supported the
non-cooperation movement.
• Impact on British Policy: The dual pressure from both violent and non-violent
movements forced the British to reconsider their policies. They realized that
maintaining control over India was becoming increasingly difficult.
15
Easy2Siksha
6. Conclusion: The Legacy of the Revolutionary Movement
• A Lasting Impact: The revolutionary movement, while not always successful in
achieving its immediate goals, had a lasting impact on the Indian freedom struggle. It
kept the spirit of resistance alive and inspired future generations to continue the
fight for independence.
• Complementary to Non-Violent Struggle: The revolutionary activities and the non-
cooperation movement were two sides of the same coin. Both were essential in the
eventual success of the Indian freedom struggle, as they put pressure on the British
from different fronts.
• Inspiration for Future Movements: The legacy of the revolutionary movement
continued to inspire post-independence India, with leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose
taking up the cause of complete independence with a more militant approach.
Why Did Mahatma Gandhi Launch the Non-Cooperation Movement?
1. Background of the Movement
• Rowlatt Act (1919): The Rowlatt Act allowed the British government to imprison any
person suspected of terrorism without trial. This act angered many Indians and led
to widespread protests.
• Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919): The massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, where British
troops killed hundreds of unarmed Indian protesters, was a turning point. It
convinced Gandhi that the British government was immoral and oppressive.
• Khilafat Movement: Gandhi also wanted to support the Khilafat Movement, which
aimed to protect the Ottoman Caliphate, a symbol of Islamic unity. He believed that
by aligning with this cause, he could unite Hindus and Muslims against the British.
2. Objectives of the Non-Cooperation Movement
• Boycott of British Goods and Services: Gandhi called for a complete boycott of
British goods, schools, courts, and government services. He believed that by refusing
to cooperate with the British, Indians could weaken their control over the country.
• Promotion of Swadeshi: Gandhi encouraged the use of Indian-made goods
(Swadeshi) and the revival of traditional industries like handloom weaving. This was
both an economic and a symbolic move to promote self-reliance.
• Self-Government (Swaraj): The ultimate goal of the movement was to achieve
Swaraj or self-rule for India. Gandhi believed that if enough people joined the
movement, the British would be forced to grant India independence.
3. Course of the Movement
• Mass Participation: The Non-Cooperation Movement saw massive participation
from all sections of Indian society. It was the first time that millions of Indians,
including peasants, workers, students, and women, actively participated in the
freedom struggle.
16
Easy2Siksha
• Chauri Chaura Incident (1922): The movement took a violent turn when protesters
in Chauri Chaura set fire to a police station, killing 22 policemen. Gandhi, a staunch
believer in non-violence, was deeply disturbed by this incident and decided to call off
the movement.
4. Impact of the Movement
• Widespread Awakening: The Non-Cooperation Movement awakened a sense of
national consciousness among Indians. It brought the freedom struggle to the
masses and made it a truly national movement.
• Unity Among Indians: The movement played a significant role in uniting Hindus and
Muslims in the fight against British rule. Gandhi’s support for the Khilafat Movement
helped bridge communal differences.
• Increased Repression: The British government responded to the movement with
increased repression, including mass arrests and censorship. However, this only
strengthened the resolve of many Indians to fight for independence.
• Foundation for Future Movements: Although the Non-Cooperation Movement was
suspended, it laid the foundation for future mass movements like the Civil
Disobedience Movement (1930) and the Quit India Movement (1942). It also
established Gandhi as a key leader of the Indian freedom struggle.
Conclusion
The Revolutionary Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement were both integral to
the Indian freedom struggle, each contributing in its own way. While the revolutionaries
inspired courage and sacrifice, Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement brought the masses
into the fold and established the principle of non-violent resistance. Together, these
movements created the momentum that eventually led to India’s independence in 1947.
Understanding the interplay between these two approaches helps us appreciate the
complexity and richness of India’s struggle for freedom.
6.Discuss its significance in the history Freedom Movement in India.
Ans: The Beginning of British Rule: From 1707 to 1857
1. The Mughal Empire's Decline (1707):
o The death of Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707 marked the beginning of the
decline of the Mughal Empire. This weakened central authority in India,
leading to political fragmentation. Many regional powers, like the Marathas,
Sikhs, and Rajputs, began asserting their independence.
2. The Rise of the British East India Company:
o The British East India Company, initially a trading company, took advantage
of this political instability. They started gaining control over Indian territories
through military and political means. The Battle of Plassey in 1757 and the
Battle of Buxar in 1764 were crucial victories for the British, establishing their
dominance in Bengal and other parts of India.
17
Easy2Siksha
3. The Expansion of British Control:
o By the early 19th century, the British had established their control over most
of India through a mix of military conquests, alliances, and treaties. The
Doctrine of Lapse, introduced by Lord Dalhousie, allowed the British to annex
any princely state where the ruler died without a male heir, further
expanding their empire.
4. Economic Exploitation:
o The British exploited India's resources for their own economic gain. They
imposed heavy taxes on farmers, leading to widespread poverty and famine.
Indian industries, particularly textiles, suffered due to British policies that
favored imports of British goods. This economic exploitation created
widespread resentment among Indians.
The First War of Independence (1857)
5. The Revolt of 1857:
o The Revolt of 1857, also known as the First War of Independence, was a
major, though unsuccessful, uprising against British rule. It began as a mutiny
by Indian soldiers (sepoys) but soon spread to other parts of the country. The
revolt was fueled by various factors, including resentment over British
policies, economic exploitation, and cultural insensitivity, such as the use of
animal fat in cartridges that offended both Hindu and Muslim soldiers.
6. Significance of the 1857 Revolt:
o Although the revolt was crushed by the British, it marked the beginning of a
nationalistic consciousness among Indians. It showed that Indians were
capable of challenging British rule, even if the movement lacked unity and
coordination at that time. The British government, in response, dissolved the
East India Company and took direct control of India, marking the start of the
British Raj in 1858.
The Rise of Nationalism and the Indian National Congress (1885)
7. The Formation of the Indian National Congress:
o The Indian National Congress (INC) was founded in 1885 by a group of
educated Indians, including A.O. Hume, a retired British official. Initially, the
INC aimed to voice Indian grievances and seek reforms within the British rule.
The early phase of the INC was dominated by moderate leaders like Dadabhai
Naoroji and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, who believed in petitions and
negotiations with the British.
8. The Growth of Nationalism:
o The late 19th century saw the growth of Indian nationalism, fueled by the
economic exploitation, racial discrimination, and repressive policies of the
British. The partition of Bengal in 1905 by Lord Curzon was a turning point, as
it was seen as an attempt to divide and rule by creating religious divisions
between Hindus and Muslims. The strong opposition to the partition led to
the Swadeshi Movement, where Indians boycotted British goods and
promoted Indian-made products.
18
Easy2Siksha
The Impact of World War I and the Non-Cooperation Movement (1919-1922)
9. World War I and its Aftermath:
o During World War I (1914-1918), the British promised political reforms in
return for Indian support in the war. However, the Montagu-Chelmsford
Reforms of 1919 fell short of Indian expectations, leading to widespread
discontent. The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre in 1919, where British troops
killed hundreds of unarmed Indians, further inflamed Indian anger against
British rule.
10. The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922):
o Led by Mahatma Gandhi, the Non-Cooperation Movement was a significant
phase in the Indian Freedom Movement. Gandhi advocated for non-violent
resistance (satyagraha) and urged Indians to boycott British goods,
institutions, and services. The movement was widespread and involved
people from all walks of life, marking a shift towards mass participation in the
freedom struggle. Although the movement was called off in 1922 after the
Chauri Chaura incident, where a violent clash resulted in the death of
policemen, it had already mobilized millions of Indians against British rule.
The Civil Disobedience Movement and the Demand for Complete Independence
11. The Civil Disobedience Movement (1930-1934):
o The Civil Disobedience Movement, launched by Gandhi in 1930, aimed to
defy British laws peacefully. The Salt March (Dandi March) in March 1930 was
a symbolic act of defiance, where Gandhi and his followers marched to the
Arabian Sea to make salt, challenging the British monopoly on salt
production. The movement saw widespread participation across the country,
with Indians refusing to pay taxes, boycotting British goods, and breaking
colonial laws. Although the movement was eventually suppressed, it put the
British government under tremendous pressure.
12. The Demand for Complete Independence:
o By the late 1920s, the demand for complete independence (Purna Swaraj)
gained momentum within the INC. On January 26, 1930, the INC declared
Purna Swaraj as its ultimate goal, rejecting British dominion status. This
period also saw the rise of more radical leaders within the Congress, like
Subhas Chandra Bose, who believed in more aggressive methods to achieve
independence.
World War II and the Final Phase of the Freedom Struggle
13. World War II and the Quit India Movement (1942):
o The outbreak of World War II in 1939 once again tested India's relationship
with the British. Without consulting Indian leaders, the British declared
India's involvement in the war. This led to widespread anger, and in 1942,
Gandhi launched the Quit India Movement, demanding an immediate end to
British rule. The movement was met with severe repression, with thousands
19
Easy2Siksha
of leaders and activists being arrested. Despite the crackdown, the
movement showed the determination of Indians to achieve independence.
14. The Role of Subhas Chandra Bose:
o Subhas Chandra Bose, a prominent leader who disagreed with Gandhi's non-
violent approach, sought help from Germany and Japan during World War II
to fight the British. He formed the Indian National Army (INA) and fought
alongside Japanese forces in Burma. Although the INA was eventually
defeated, Bose's efforts inspired many Indians and added pressure on the
British.
The Path to Independence and Partition (1947)
15. Post-War Developments:
o After World War II, Britain was weakened economically and politically. The
Labour Party, which came to power in Britain in 1945, was more sympathetic
to Indian aspirations. The naval mutiny of 1946, along with widespread
unrest and communal violence, convinced the British that they could no
longer maintain control over India.
16. The Cabinet Mission and the Mountbatten Plan:
o In 1946, the British government sent the Cabinet Mission to India to
negotiate the terms of independence. However, differences between the INC
and the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, over the question of
Pakistan led to a deadlock. Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India,
proposed a plan for the partition of India into two independent nations: India
and Pakistan. The plan was accepted, and on August 15, 1947, India gained
independence, but at the cost of partition and the accompanying communal
violence.
Significance of the Freedom Movement (1707-1947)
17. A Long Struggle for Freedom:
o The period from 1707 to 1947 represents a long and arduous struggle for
freedom. It involved various phases, from early resistance to British
expansion, through organized political movements, to mass mobilizations
that eventually led to independence. The Indian Freedom Movement was
unique in its use of non-violence as a tool for resistance, especially under
Gandhi's leadership.
18. Unity in Diversity:
o Despite the challenges posed by India's diversity in terms of religion,
language, and culture, the freedom movement succeeded in uniting people
across these differences. The movement fostered a sense of national identity
and pride among Indians, which was crucial in mobilizing people against
British rule.
19. Inspiration for Future Movements:
o The Indian Freedom Movement inspired many other colonies around the
world to fight for their independence. India's struggle demonstrated that a
20
Easy2Siksha
determined and united people could successfully challenge and overthrow
colonial rule.
20. Legacy of the Freedom Movement:
o The legacy of the Indian Freedom Movement continues to shape modern
India. The values of democracy, secularism, and social justice, which were
central to the movement, are enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The
movement also laid the foundation for India’s political, social, and economic
development post-independence.
Conclusion
The period from 1707 to 1947 was one of significant transformation in Indian history. It
witnessed the rise and fall of empires, the establishment of British colonial rule, and the
long struggle for
SECTION-D
7. Discuss the system of Dyarchy set up in the provinces by the Government of India Act,
1919. Why did it fail?
Ans: The System of Dyarchy Set Up by the Government of India Act, 1919
Introduction
The period from 1707 to 1947 was crucial in shaping the history of India. During this time,
India was under British colonial rule, and various administrative changes were introduced to
control the country. One of the significant reforms introduced by the British was the
Government of India Act, 1919. This act introduced a new system of governance in the
provinces known as "Dyarchy." Understanding this system is important to comprehend the
political developments in India during British rule.
Background of the Government of India Act, 1919
Before diving into the system of Dyarchy, it's essential to understand the context in which
the Government of India Act, 1919, was introduced. After the First World War (1914-1918),
there was growing discontent among Indians regarding British rule. The war had caused
economic hardships, and the British government had made promises of reforms to gain
Indian support during the war. However, these promises were not fulfilled adequately.
The Indian National Congress (INC) and other political leaders were demanding greater self-
governance and more involvement of Indians in the administration. The British government
realized that some reforms were necessary to placate Indian demands and prevent any
large-scale rebellion. This led to the introduction of the Government of India Act, 1919, also
21
Easy2Siksha
known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, named after Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of
State for India, and Lord Chelmsford, the Viceroy of India.
What is Dyarchy?
Dyarchy, derived from the Greek word "Di-arche," meaning "double rule," was a system
introduced in the provinces under the Government of India Act, 1919. Under this system,
the governance of provinces was divided into two parts:
1. Transferred Subjects: These were subjects or areas of administration that were
transferred to the control of Indian ministers, who were responsible to the provincial
legislatures. These included areas like education, health, agriculture, and local self-
government.
2. Reserved Subjects: These were subjects retained under the control of the Governor
and his executive council, who were responsible to the British government. These
included areas like law and order, finance, police, and revenue.
In simple terms, Dyarchy meant that the provincial government was divided into two
parts—one controlled by Indians and the other controlled by the British.
How Did Dyarchy Work?
The idea behind Dyarchy was to gradually involve Indians in the administration and to give
them some experience in governance. It was a step toward self-governance, though a very
limited one. Here's how it worked:
1. Provincial Legislative Councils: Each province had a legislative council, which was
partly elected and partly nominated. The elected members were mostly Indians, and
they were supposed to have control over the transferred subjects.
2. Indian Ministers: For the transferred subjects, Indian ministers were appointed.
These ministers were responsible for the administration of these subjects and were
answerable to the provincial legislative councils.
3. Governor's Powers: The Governor of each province had control over the reserved
subjects. Even in the transferred subjects, the Governor had the power to veto the
decisions of the Indian ministers if he believed it was necessary.
4. Executive Council: The Governor was assisted by an Executive Council, which was
responsible for the reserved subjects. The members of this council were usually
British officials.
In summary, Dyarchy was a dual system of governance where some powers were given to
Indian ministers, but the ultimate control remained with the British.
Why Did Dyarchy Fail?
Despite being a step toward involving Indians in governance, Dyarchy was largely
unsuccessful. There were several reasons for its failure:
22
Easy2Siksha
1. Limited Powers to Indian Ministers: The Indian ministers had control over only a few
subjects, and even in those areas, their powers were limited. The Governor could
overrule their decisions, which made their position weak. This limited power
frustrated the Indian ministers and the public.
2. Lack of Real Autonomy: The Indian ministers were not given real autonomy. They
were always under the watchful eye of the British officials. This made the system
ineffective in bringing about significant changes or reforms in the provinces.
3. Financial Control: One of the biggest drawbacks of Dyarchy was that the reserved
subjects, which were under British control, included finance. This meant that Indian
ministers did not have control over the budget or financial resources. Without
financial control, they could not effectively implement policies or make decisions in
the transferred subjects.
4. Lack of Cooperation: The system required cooperation between the Indian ministers
and the British officials. However, there was a lack of trust and cooperation between
the two groups. The British officials often did not take the Indian ministers seriously,
and the Indian ministers felt powerless and frustrated.
5. Public Discontent: The Indian public was not satisfied with the limited reforms
introduced by the Government of India Act, 1919. They saw Dyarchy as a half-
hearted attempt by the British to maintain control while giving a false impression of
self-governance. This discontent was reflected in the growing support for the Indian
National Congress and the demand for complete independence.
6. Non-Cooperation Movement: The failure of Dyarchy was also evident in the rise of
the Non-Cooperation Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920. This movement
was a direct response to the discontent with the British rule and the limited reforms.
The Indian people were not willing to accept half measures and wanted complete
self-rule.
7. Complexity of the System: Dyarchy was a complicated system to implement. The
division of subjects into transferred and reserved categories created confusion and
conflicts in administration. It was difficult for the provincial governments to function
effectively under this dual system.
8. Lack of Experience: Many Indian ministers lacked experience in governance, and
they were often not provided with the necessary support or training to handle their
responsibilities. This further weakened the effectiveness of Dyarchy.
Impact of the Failure of Dyarchy
The failure of Dyarchy had significant consequences for British rule in India:
1. Demand for Greater Reforms: The failure of Dyarchy intensified the demand for
greater reforms and more autonomy for Indians. It became clear that the limited
reforms of the Government of India Act, 1919, were not sufficient to satisfy the
growing aspirations of the Indian people.
2. Rise of Nationalist Movements: The discontent with Dyarchy fueled the growth of
nationalist movements in India. The Indian National Congress, under the leadership
of Mahatma Gandhi, launched the Non-Cooperation Movement, which marked a
significant shift in the struggle for independence. The failure of Dyarchy convinced
23
Easy2Siksha
many Indians that the British government was not serious about granting self-rule
and that more direct action was needed.
3. Simon Commission: The British government realized that the system of Dyarchy was
not working and that further reforms were necessary. This led to the appointment of
the Simon Commission in 1927 to review the functioning of the Government of India
Act, 1919, and suggest further changes. However, the Simon Commission was
boycotted by all Indian political parties because it did not include any Indian
members.
4. Government of India Act, 1935: The failure of Dyarchy eventually led to the
introduction of the Government of India Act, 1935. This act abolished Dyarchy in the
provinces and introduced provincial autonomy, giving more powers to Indian
ministers. However, it also introduced Dyarchy at the central level, which was again
met with criticism.
Conclusion
The system of Dyarchy introduced by the Government of India Act, 1919, was an experiment
in involving Indians in the governance of their country. However, it was a flawed system that
failed to meet the aspirations of the Indian people. The limited powers given to Indian
ministers, the lack of real autonomy, and the complex nature of the system led to its failure.
The discontent with Dyarchy played a crucial role in the rise of nationalist movements and
the eventual demand for complete independence. The failure of Dyarchy highlighted the
limitations of British reforms and the growing demand for self-rule among Indians. It was a
significant step in the larger struggle for independence, paving the way for future reforms
and, ultimately, the end of British rule in India.
8. Critically examine the proposals and outcome of the Cabinet Mission Plan.
Ans: he Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946 was a pivotal moment in the history of India. It was
one of the last major attempts by the British government to resolve the ongoing conflict
between Indian leaders before India gained independence. To understand the significance
of the Cabinet Mission Plan, we need to delve into its proposals, the reactions of the Indian
political leaders, and its outcomes. I'll break this down in simple terms so that it's easy to
remember.
Background
By 1946, India was on the brink of independence. The British, who had ruled India for nearly
200 years, were exhausted by World War II and facing increasing pressure from Indian
leaders to grant independence. The major Indian political parties at the time were the
Indian National Congress (INC), which was largely Hindu-dominated, and the All India
Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, which sought a separate Muslim state called
Pakistan.
24
Easy2Siksha
Tensions were high between the Congress and the Muslim League. The Congress wanted a
united India, while the Muslim League insisted on a separate nation for Muslims. The British
government sent a delegation known as the "Cabinet Mission" to India in March 1946 to try
and find a solution that would satisfy both sides.
Proposals of the Cabinet Mission Plan
The Cabinet Mission put forward several key proposals to address the political deadlock in
India:
1. Formation of a United India: The Mission rejected the idea of creating two separate
nations, India and Pakistan. Instead, it proposed a united India with a federal
structure. This means that India would remain one country but with a central
government that shared power with provincial governments.
2. Three-tier Government: The Cabinet Mission suggested a three-tier government
structure:
o Union Government: This would handle defense, foreign affairs, and
communications.
o Group of Provinces: The provinces were to be divided into three groups.
â–ª Group A: Consisted of the Hindu-majority provinces.
â–ª Group B: Consisted of the Muslim-majority provinces in the
northwest.
â–ª Group C: Consisted of the Muslim-majority provinces in the northeast,
including Bengal and Assam.
o Provincial Governments: Each province would have its own government
handling local matters like education, health, and agriculture.
3. Constituent Assembly: The Cabinet Mission proposed setting up a Constituent
Assembly to draft the Constitution of India. The Assembly would have
representatives from all the provinces. Importantly, each group of provinces would
have the right to opt out of the Union and form their own constitution if they were
not happy with the Union government after ten years.
4. Interim Government: Before the Constituent Assembly could start its work, an
interim government was to be formed with Indian leaders from different parties.
This government would run the country until a new constitution was created and full
independence was granted.
Reactions to the Cabinet Mission Plan
The proposals of the Cabinet Mission Plan received mixed reactions from the Indian political
parties.
1. Indian National Congress:
o The Congress accepted the idea of a Constituent Assembly and a united India.
o However, they were not happy with the idea of dividing the provinces into
groups, as this was seen as a way of creating a future Pakistan.
o The Congress leaders also wanted more power for the central government
and less for the provinces.
25
Easy2Siksha
2. All India Muslim League:
o The Muslim League initially accepted the Plan because it allowed for the
grouping of Muslim-majority provinces, which could later become Pakistan.
o However, they were disappointed that the Mission rejected the idea of an
outright division of India.
o Jinnah and the Muslim League were also wary of the Congress's intentions
and feared that the Congress would dominate the central government.
3. Smaller Political Groups and Princely States:
o Many smaller political groups and leaders of princely states had their
concerns. Some were worried about losing their autonomy, while others
feared the dominance of either the Congress or the Muslim League.
Outcome of the Cabinet Mission Plan
Despite initial acceptance, the implementation of the Cabinet Mission Plan faced numerous
challenges, leading to its eventual failure.
1. Breakdown of Negotiations:
o The Congress and the Muslim League could not agree on how the grouping of
provinces should be implemented.
o The Muslim League insisted on a strict grouping with no changes, while the
Congress wanted the provinces to have the freedom to choose whether to
join a group or not.
o This disagreement led to a breakdown in negotiations between the two
parties.
2. Direct Action Day:
o On August 16, 1946, the Muslim League declared a "Direct Action Day" to
demand the creation of Pakistan. This led to widespread communal violence,
especially in Bengal, resulting in thousands of deaths.
o The violence made it clear that the country was on the brink of civil war,
further complicating the implementation of the Cabinet Mission Plan.
3. Formation of the Interim Government:
o Despite the violence and disagreements, an interim government was formed
in September 1946, with Jawaharlal Nehru as the head.
o However, the Muslim League refused to cooperate and boycotted the
government, which led to further tensions.
4. Constituent Assembly Boycott:
o The Constituent Assembly began its work in December 1946, but the Muslim
League boycotted it, arguing that it did not represent Muslim interests.
o The Congress went ahead with the drafting of the Constitution without the
participation of the Muslim League.
5. Partition of India:
o By early 1947, it was clear that the Cabinet Mission Plan had failed to bring
about a peaceful resolution.
o The continuing violence and the breakdown of negotiations forced the British
government to consider other options.
26
Easy2Siksha
o On June 3, 1947, the British government announced its plan to partition India
into two independent nations: India and Pakistan.
o The partition plan was accepted by both the Congress and the Muslim
League, leading to the creation of Pakistan on August 14, 1947, and India on
August 15, 1947.
Significance and Legacy
The Cabinet Mission Plan is significant in Indian history for several reasons:
1. Final Attempt at Unity: The Plan represented the last major attempt by the British to
keep India united. Although it ultimately failed, it showed that there was still a
strong desire among many leaders to avoid partition.
2. Foundation for the Constituent Assembly: Despite its failure, the Plan led to the
formation of the Constituent Assembly, which went on to draft the Constitution of
India. The work of the Assembly laid the foundation for the democratic structure of
independent India.
3. Precursor to Partition: The failure of the Cabinet Mission Plan highlighted the deep
divisions between Hindus and Muslims, making partition almost inevitable. The
violence that followed the failure of the Plan further demonstrated the need for a
separate Muslim state, in the eyes of many Muslims.
4. Impact on British Policy: The failure of the Cabinet Mission Plan also made it clear to
the British that they could no longer maintain control over India. This realization
hastened their decision to leave India, leading to the eventual withdrawal in August
1947.
Conclusion
The Cabinet Mission Plan was a well-intentioned but ultimately unsuccessful attempt to
resolve the conflict between the Indian National Congress and the All India Muslim League.
Its proposals for a united India with a federal structure, a Constituent Assembly, and an
interim government were ambitious but could not bridge the deep-seated differences
between the two major political parties.
The breakdown of negotiations, the outbreak of communal violence, and the refusal of the
Muslim League to cooperate with the interim government led to the failure of the Plan. This
failure set the stage for the partition of India, which remains one of the most significant and
tragic events in the subcontinent's history.
In essence, the Cabinet Mission Plan was a crucial turning point that ultimately led to the
end of British rule in India and the birth of two independent nations, India and Pakistan. Its
legacy is a reminder of the complexities of India's struggle for independence and the
challenges of forging unity in a diverse and divided society.
Note: This Answer Paper is totally Solved by Ai (Artificial Intelligence) So if You find Any Error Or Mistake . Give us a
Feedback related Error , We will Definitely Try To solve this Problem Or Error.
